Suggestion: update # reflects image version

Karl Ramberg karl.ramberg at chello.se
Tue Feb 6 16:03:53 UTC 2001


how about 3.1.change set number ?
karl

Henrik Gedenryd wrote:
> 
> Dan Ingalls wrote:
> 
> > Ted Kaehler and Michael Rueger are fashioning a new update server out of whole
> > cloth.  This is actually a good thing -- we should have done it months ago.
> 
> May I humbly suggest that we begin numbering changes from 30000, so that the
> change set # will reflect the version of an image. Moving to 3.1a will then
> require a jump to set # 31000. (3 digits are needed to ensure that we don't
> overrun a number sequence).
> 
> Henrik





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list