Ned Konz wrote:
> 
> On Thursday 22 February 2001 13:29, Stephan Rudlof wrote:
> 
> > first thank you for your neat contribution!
> 
> You're welcome! It helps to be a lazy programmer...
> 
> > > * categorize all uncategorized
> > > Assign categories to all of my uncategorized methods by looking through
> > > my superclasses.
> >
> > What happens with uncategorized methods wich are not categorized in any
> > superclass?
> 
> They stay in "as yet unclassified"
> 
> > > * categorize from superclasses
> > > Assign or change categories to some or all of my methods by looking
> > > through my superclasses. Do not change a category if none of my
> > > superclasses defines a category.
> >
> > Precedence? From topdown or downtop?
> 
> >From the current class up through its superclasses to the first one defining
> a category.
> 
> > > * recategorize all
> > > Recategorize all methods that are categorized in my superclasses; leave
> > > the rest as uncategorized.
> >
> > Does this also mean moving already categorized methods in the actual class
> > to uncategorized, if they aren't categorized in any superclass?
> 
> No. Just as it says: "all methods that are categorized in my superclasses".

Is this feature feature "categorize from superclasses" for all classes?
If yes: Is "categorize from superclasses" started bottomup or topdown in
each class hierarchy (probably topdown here)?
If no: What's the difference between "recategorize all" and "categorize from
superclasses" then?

Greetings,

Stephan

> 
> --
> Ned Konz
> currently: Stanwood, WA
> email:     ned at bike-nomad.com
> homepage:  http://bike-nomad.com

-- 
Stephan Rudlof (sr at evolgo.de)
   "Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis.
    You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'"
    -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3