Stephane Ducasse wrote:
> 
> Thanks for exactness
> 
> I did not check this one! But My intention was to show the impact of been
> free to extend class (which I like) in a uncontrolled manner.
> 
> > While I too like classes that are small enough to understand,
> > this specific claim is untrue.  String>>asHtml uses only Collection
> > methods.  The HtmlEntities table it refers to lives in String.

Which you still did. If your application does not use HTML, what do you
need a HTMLEntities table in String for.

Michael

-- 
 "To improve is to change, to be perfect is to change often." 
                                            Winston Churchill
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael Rueger    m.rueger at acm.org      ++1 (310) 937 7196 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+