"Richard A. O'Keefe" wrote:
> 
>         > (4) The parenthesis count could be reduced still further if min: and max:
>         >     were operators instead of keywords.
>         Duh? Operators? We don't got no steenkin operators. Now _binary
>         messages_ ok, but operators?
> 
> operator == binary message, ok?
Well since it's you, ok. I suspect that normally most people would tend
to map 'operator' to 'reserved word' and similar concepts, which of
course is not ok because we're too clever to limit ourselves to only a
list of reserved words like mundane languages.

tim