smalltalk76
Jecel Assumpcao Jr
jecel at merlintec.com
Fri Mar 30 23:49:20 UTC 2001
On Thursday 29 March 2001 20:35, Alan Kay wrote:
> Most importantly, class Class was an instance of itself, and class
> Object was a superclass of itself. The "magic of microcode" was what
> allowed those two relations to be circular.
Since you only follow the class pointer once, the first circular
relation isn't a problem. But it would seem to me that a circular
superclass relation would require a special termination test just as
much as the current nil superclass one does. I would be very much
interested in knowing what you can do in microcode that can't be done
in assembly or C, specially since I am currently building a microcoded
machine!
> The explicit metaclasses
> of Smalltalk-80 really don't do enough work to justify their
> complexity IMNSHO.
They allow class methods and class variables (or is that class instance
variables?), which I don't think are a big deal either.
> But, wait until after this summer .....
Summer is just over down here (Brazil), so do I get a sneak preview? ;-)
But seriously, I am trying to define a very simple object model
(something that is to Self like what Self is to Smalltalk) that is
clean and poweful and could be explained to an interested 12 year old
kid. I can be as nostalgic as the next guy and have been revisting the
work I have done in object oriented Logos and Smalltalk, Lisp machine
ideas and other stuff. See
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/self-interest/message/1022
-- Jecel
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|