The changeset I've just put out uses:
'create textural references to dropped morphs' 
with a checkbox showing whether it is active or not. 

I like this a bit better than your wording because it emphasizes that it is 
a _text_ reference.  Plus, it seems less ambiguous about which morphs are
being dropped.  However, I'm the guy who messed up the wording in the first
place, so who am I to talk?

Thanks for the input (any other suggestions),
Joshua


On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 01:03:23PM -0000, rkiesling at mainmatter.com wrote:
> 
> Joshua Channing Gargus  <schwa at cc.gatech.edu> writes:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > BTW, that menu label is terrible, but I had a hard time thinking up something
> > better.  How about 'create textual reference to dropped morphs' with a 
> > checkbox beside it instead?  I'll go do that right now; I'm embarassed to 
> > have the current wording attached to me.
> 
> Not that I have any reason to comment, but how about "Show Morph Reference when Dropped" ?
> 
> -- 
> Robert Kiesling
> Linux FAQ Maintainer 
> rkiesling at mainmatter.com
> http://www.mainmatter.com/linux-faq/toc.html  http://www.mainmatter.com/
> ---
> Tired of spam?  Please forward messages to uce at ftc.gov.
>