On Wednesday 23 May 2001 04:12, Andrew C. Greenberg wrote:

> The SqueakL from Apple expressly contemplates using different language,
> but requires that no new license be less protective of Apple than
> SqueakL.  There are other limitations as well.  Accordingly, a
> Apple/fontless Squeak could probably be licensed without the Apple
> Fonts.  For the same reason, I doubt you could remove the export
> requirements.

I have been curious about that. I thought the US embargo of, say, Cuba was an 
economic thing. Is it illegal for USAmericans to supply Cubans with _free_ 
software?

Just wondering... anyone know?

-- 
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email:     ned at bike-nomad.com
homepage:  http://bike-nomad.com