Daniel, Leandro,

Thanks for the code! The chunk downloading feature seems very useful to me.
The nice thing about it is that the setting allows me to trade saving speed
with avoiding duplicates. I have installed it and tried it out. Seems to
work great.

Now comes salvage&compact...

- Bernhard


----- Original Message -----
From: <danielv at netvision.net.il>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 11:46 PM
Subject: [FIX][ENH-FIX]Re: [BUG]? Celeste message parsing error: At least
onedigit expected here


> Leandro's code is great, but has a sort-of-bug (coded on non-up-to-date
image, LC?).
>
> It seems to lose mail, and exposed a weakness in our salvage&compact.
>
> Fixes for both attached, I recommend Leandro's code with patch for
inclusion.
>
> If you've been using LC's code, and suspect you've been missing messages-
> * file in both attached Changesets,
> * salvage&compact -twice- and,
> * check out your .unclassified. messages.
>
> An initialy solution to badly form mail - on error's generate a
FileIndexEntry
> with todays date and the subject "Badly formed mail". The user can take it
from
> there...
>
> Implementation left as exercise to reader (might require some refactoring
to the
> usage of FileIndexEntry by the UI - not a bad idea).
>
> Daniel
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> "Change Set: CelesteConservativeSalvage
> Date: 11 November 2001
> Author: Daniel Vainsencher
>
> Make Salvage&Compact recreate all the index entries from the message
> text, without regard to the old index (which might be confused)."!
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> from preamble:
>
> "Change Set: CelesteChunkedFetchFix
> Date: 11 November 2001
> Author: Daniel Vainsencher
>
> Prerequisite: Leandro Caniglias Celeste-FetchLimit.
>
> This changeset fixes a bad interaction between this code and an update
> by mdr from April."!
>