XML Parser choice (was Re: [ENH] ??? MD5 in Squeak.)
Alan Knight
aknight at cincom.com
Wed Nov 28 03:39:50 UTC 2001
It's certainly not intended to, and I didn't think that was the intent of
the Mozilla license, from which this was derived. What is the phrasing you
find problematic? I would expect that management would be willing to get
any such wording changed to clarify the intention.
At 05:19 PM 11/27/2001 -0500, Andrew C. Greenberg wrote:
> From a quick review, thePPL's definitions of Covered Code raises the
> virus-swallows-the-entire-image problem, I think. Any chance we can get
> someone to agree to dual-license? Otherwise, it seems we should adopt
> instead the unambiguously Squeak-L code.
>
>On Tuesday, November 27, 2001, at 03:22 PM, Duane Maxwell wrote:
>
>>Andrew C. Greenberg asks:
>>>How is the VW parser licensed?
>>
>>> From what I can figure out from following the various links on minnow
>>> to the
>>Camp Smalltalk page, it's apparently released under something called the
>>"ParcPlace Public License", which claims to be derived from the Mozilla
>>Public License V 1.1.
>>
>>Text can be found at
>>http://www.parcplace.com/support/opensource/PPL-1.0.html
>>
>>-- Duane
>>
--
Alan Knight [|], Cincom Smalltalk Development
knight at acm.org
aknight at cincom.com
http://www.cincom.com/scripts/smalltalk.exe/downloads/index.asp
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|