Why we should remove {} from Squeak
John Dougan
jdougan at acm.org
Wed Oct 3 02:48:42 UTC 2001
At 03:17 PM 02/10/01, you wrote:
>The ANSI discussions were in the context of adding {} as a new feature as
>none to the commercial Smalltalk implementations supported it.
Not quite true. Gemstone/S supports this feature with a different syntax:
#[ <expr1> , <expr2> , ... ] == { <expr1> . <expr2> . ...}
Was Gemstone not represented on the committee?
--john
--
John Dougan
jdougan at acm.org
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|