danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
	> but with your point of view =
	> a good caching we could get rid of #() ;) this would be fun.
	Which is more alien to Smalltalk and more surprising (an object that's
	implicitly shared with all subclass instances?! - not a shared variable,
	an implicitly shared *object*! that can be modified!) than {}, and
	semantically weaker.
	
String literals are just like #() in this respect.