Marcel Weiher wrote:
> 
> On Sunday, September 2, 2001, at 10:19 PM, Lex Spoon wrote:

> >
> > By the way, there is a nice generalization of the above with:foo:
> > pattern.  It looks like this:
> >
> >       (firstArray with: secondArray) collect: [ :combo | combo first + combo
> > second ]
> 
> I have to admit I like
> 
>         firstArray collect + secondArray each
> 
> better, though it is far from perfect, because the structure of the
> intended is still visible in the lexical structure of the code (LHS  +
> RHS), even if both the LHS and the RHS are a little mucked up.
> 

The best one so far ( I think) is 
 firstArray + secondArray 
which works like a charm :-)
But you still have to know that the arrays have equal size.

Karl