JPEG Compression?
John M McIntosh
johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com
Sat Sep 8 20:12:15 UTC 2001
>John M McIntosh wrote:
>
>> perhaps we could
>> merge the work and provide a single plugin for photosqueak that would
>> do TIFF and JPEG
>
>Am I completely wrong in suspecting that the tiff code is much bigger than
>that for jpeg? Tiff is one big hairy standard. My point is that jpeg will
>find much more general use, while a big tiff plugin in every vm might be a
>less appealing idea.
>
>Henrik
Yes, the TIFF plugin is much bigger, but some cameras will dump
either TIFF or j peg, and my thought was that I'm already including
the jpeg library as part of the TIFF stuff because it is one of the
compression methods for TIFF.
--
--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> 1-800-477-2659
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|