JPEG Compression?

John M McIntosh johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com
Sat Sep 8 20:12:15 UTC 2001


>John M McIntosh wrote:
>
>>  perhaps we could
>>  merge the work and provide a single plugin for photosqueak that would
>>  do TIFF and JPEG
>
>Am I completely wrong in suspecting that the tiff code is much bigger than
>that for jpeg? Tiff is one big hairy standard. My point is that jpeg will
>find much more general use, while a big tiff plugin in every vm might be a
>less appealing idea.
>
>Henrik

Yes, the TIFF plugin is much bigger, but some cameras will dump 
either TIFF or j peg, and my thought was that I'm already including 
the jpeg library as part of the TIFF stuff because it is one of the 
compression methods for TIFF.
-- 
--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> 1-800-477-2659
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list