Hi Goran,

What in particular don't you like about the squeak.org design?  Possibly
it is a little minimal, but it was intended to be a "strict, clean,
fastloading site with a 'good look'"...

The main problem I would see in the web presence of Squeak is that most
of our contents (and there is a suprising amount) is on the swiki, not
on squeak.org.  Maybe we should merge the two, and only have the swiki
at squeak.org...

Cheers,

Russell

goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:
> > >1. Polish the webpresence for Squeak. The website doesn't look so
> > >"cool". This takes time and dedication...
> > 
> > It's not about coolness, it's about completeness. Compare Python.org with the
> > Squeak stuff. 
> 
> And coolness. :-) Seriously, I agree but I also think the polish is
> important.
> I know myself - if I stumble upon a site (for a language) which seems
> amateurish I think "Hmmm, ok these guys don't have a clue about HTML,
> why should they have a clue about programming?". Do note though that
> non-amateurish ~= Glitzy/Flash/JavaScript/freaked-out-site. I like
> strict, clean, fastloading sites with a "good look". Perhaps like this
> one:
> 
> http://pike.roxen.com/
> 
> Looking at the HTML source I notice though that it's not as "proper" as
> I would like, but...