straw-man 3.2 default preferences
PhiHo Hoang
phiho.hoang at rogers.com
Fri Apr 19 03:02:57 UTC 2002
> Would you also put these inboard scrollbars on the *right*,
> on similar grounds of familiarity?
And if not, why not :-)
Also, it seems that the 'silent majority' won the 'sausage'
scrollbar war ;-)
Cheers,
PhiHo.
-----Original Message-----
From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Scott
Wallace
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 10:37 PM
To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Subject: Re: straw-man 3.2 default preferences
Ned,
Well argued.
Would you also put these inboard scrollbars on the *right*, on
similar grounds of familiarity?
-- Scott
At 7:20 PM -0700 4/18/02, Ned Konz wrote:
>On Thursday 18 April 2002 06:37 pm, Scott Wallace wrote:
>
>> (inboardScrollbars false)
>
>I think this is possibly the most controversial of the preferences.
>
>My take on it is that the defaults probably should be set to inboard,
>since:
>
>(a) people are familiar with that UI behavior, and
>
>(b) it is faster to aim at something you can see than something that
>you hope will be there when you get there. If you overshoot to the left
>of the scrollbar, the scrollbar disappears again, and you have to once
>again move the mouse inside the pane to get the scrollbar back. The
>arguments relating to screen real estate aren't as important as they
>used to be.
>
>Those of us who prefer the flop-out scrollbars can certainly change
>them.
>
>Likewise,
>
>(scrollBarsWithoutMenuButton false)
>
>increases the possibility of getting a menu when you're aiming at a
>scroll bar arrow.
>
>However,
>
>(optionalButtons true)
>
>is a good idea (as Brian has noted).
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|