On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 05:51:43PM -0700, Ned Konz wrote:
> On Friday 19 April 2002 05:41 pm, Ross Boylan wrote:
> > Here's another oddity/clue:  the background update process has
> > asOop of a number that doesn't match any of the listed processes in
> > the process browser, even after updating the latter.
> >
> > (asOop seems to match the process numbers in general, but I'm not
> > completely sure it's what ProcessBrowser is using).
> 
> instanceHash

Just #hash in my image (3.2).