On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Göran Hultgren wrote:

> [...] But I still think it (the phrase on Squeak.org) should either be
> written differently - or, if people really insist on keeping the current
> phrase "Squeak is open source." then IMHO it should be accompanied with
> an explanation of FACTS. [...]

Actually, the current wording is "Squeak comes under an open source
license, meaning that you can download and use it for free." 

This is only the intro page. All the detail is in the "About" page,
including an explanation of the license terms.

> All this may sound silly to a lot of you [...]

Indeed. I'm glad you acknowledge that ;-)

-- Bert