Examining errors and failures with Squeak SUnit
Ken Causey
ken at ineffable.com
Tue Aug 6 21:08:06 UTC 2002
On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 15:55, Avi Bryant wrote:
>
> This shouldn't be the case for errors - the debug window should be right
> where the error is. I used to do exactly what you describe for failures,
> but if you hit Proceed instead it'll pop up another debugger when it hits
> the failing assertion. This is much easier.
>
Thank you. That is much better. Still not ideal but much much better.
Ken
> I agree that the TestRunner could benefit from showing the error/failure
> line, though. I just ran into this about 10 minutes ago with a
> time-sensitive test that only sometimes failed, and *always* passed when
> the debugger or transcript introduced some extra delay...
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|