Examining errors and failures with Squeak SUnit

Ken Causey ken at ineffable.com
Tue Aug 6 21:08:06 UTC 2002


On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 15:55, Avi Bryant wrote:
> 
> This shouldn't be the case for errors - the debug window should be right
> where the error is.  I used to do exactly what you describe for failures,
> but if you hit Proceed instead it'll pop up another debugger when it hits
> the failing assertion.  This is much easier.
> 

Thank you.  That is much better.  Still not ideal but much much better.

Ken

> I agree that the TestRunner could benefit from showing the error/failure
> line, though.  I just ran into this about 10 minutes ago with a
> time-sensitive test that only sometimes failed, and *always* passed when
> the debugger or transcript introduced some extra delay...
> 
> 





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list