Chris Muller <afunkyobject at yahoo.com> said:
>This allowed 100% dispersion using your tests and actually made the removeKey:
>test I posted earlier run as fast as with SmallIntegers!
>
Same with VW, it goes down to ~60ms.

>Is it a safe one?
>
I wouldn't know why not. As we've seen, all the damage that bad hash values
can do is to cause excessive collisions, so if you have a better hash
function, I'd say add it.


-- 
Cees de Groot               http://www.cdegroot.com     <cg at cdegroot.com>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD  1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
Cogito ergo evigilo