Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Alan Grimes wrote:
> 
> 
>>Squeak should _NOT_ use X, as that would be redundant and wasteful.

I wouldn't go that far, but having the option would be nice.

> What could more easily accomplished would be to start Squeak as the *only*
> X application. Possibly drawing right into the root window. X in itself

That really saves a lot of memory and CPU power. But, unless you are 
running a 3D application, you can save significantly in terms of 
installation and runtime space by not using X at all. A real issue when 
you run Squeak on a single board computer :-)

Michael

-- 

  "All of life's big problems include the words 'indictment' or
  'inoperable'. Everything else is small stuff." -- Alton Brown
  +------------------------------------------------------------+
  | Michael Rueger     m.rueger at acm.org     ++1 (310) 937 7196 |
  +------------------------------------------------------------+