I think this is a really good idea.

Cheers,

Alan

-------

At 5:02 PM -0500 12/3/02, Brent Vukmer wrote:
>More generally: I think the projects framework ought to become 
>SqueakMap aware, and vice-versa. 
>
>--SqueakMap package information could include "projects built using me".
>--The project loader code could do a lookup of "SqueakMap packages 
>required for me". 
>
>I think that this could foster neat interaction between people who 
>create Squeak projects, people who build SqueakMap packages, and 
>people who load and play with projects -and- packages.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brent Vukmer
>Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:41 PM
>To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>Subject: Projects and SqueakMap (was: RE: Connectors-based labels
>question )
>
>
>It would be really helpful ( to me, at least ) if people started 
>posting projects on SqueakMap so that I could know the dependencies 
>for those projects. 
>
>Or is there already a way to tell, before I load a project in 
>Squeak, what versions of which classes the project depends on?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ned Konz [mailto:ned at bike-nomad.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 4:31 PM
>To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>Subject: Re: Connectors-based labels question
>
>>  By the way, I really liked the presentation that was contained in
>>  the old project-based Connectors, and wish I would have seen it
>>  earlier than I did in my development process.  Is there some way
>>  you could carry this forward with the more recent changesets, and
>>  still keep it separate and deletable?
>
>Yeah, probably, though it's in a .pr project. I suppose I could post
>it separately on SqueakMap.


--