[ANN] Named Process (on SqueakMap)
Stephen Pair
spair at acm.org
Thu Dec 5 19:57:46 UTC 2002
Ok, I can't really see why the #name(:) accessor methods were giving me
problems before (other than it's much easier to deal with the senders of
processName: than senders of name: (since there are so many)). So, I've
put version 1.01 up that makes this change and an accompanying change to
Process>>browserPrintStringWith:.
- Stephen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On
> Behalf Of Bill Schwab
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 1:57 PM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: [ANN] Named Process (on SqueakMap)
>
>
> Stephen,
>
> Named processes is a long-overdue feature IMHO. However, I'm a
> little nervous about this being a SqueakMap entry. For example,
> what about the VM diagnostics to dump a call stack? Does the
> VM make assumptions about the iv layout of Process; it seems
> like it would have to do so.
>
> Rather than #processName, I would simply use #name (for Dolphin
> compatibility), but that's trivial to do with your efforts installed.
>
> Bill
>
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> bills at anest4.anest.ufl.edu
> (352) 846-1285
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|