Hi Stephen,

> Could we get the tiny image down to 1 object?  I'm actually kind of
> serious here.  I'm sure couldn't do it in 1 object, but the idea I'm
> trying to convey is that the base image should ultimately consist of an
> *extremely* small number of objects.  What those objects are, it's
> probably pre-mature to waste time at this point trying to figure out.
> But, if we set a goal of trying to shrink the base image with every
> release...we should come up with something very small in the long run.

    I will post the results to SqueakDev list as soon as I receive them 
    from the lab.

    Cheers,

    PhiHo.