On Thursday, December 26, 2002, at 08:44 PM, Daniel Joyce wrote:

>
>> What would be useful (I think) is a license that talks in terms of
>> general concepts such as units of software code, direct translation
>> of that code into alternate forms (i.e. machine code), re-use by
>> other units of code, re-distribution in source and/or translated
>> form, etc.
>>
>> - Stephen
>
>
> So let's write our own licenses then....
>
> A MIT style license, and a GPL-ish license that takes these issues into
> account for SmallTalk code.

Well, we do have Squeak-L...