>  >
>>  I'll take this up with OSI, as I think that SqF should strive to (re)license
>>  "canonical Squeak" under an OSD-compliant license. As soon as I 
>>have something
>  > back from them, I'll post here.
>
>Great. This would help us regarding FSF.

Mmm besides thinking about letting sleeping dogs lie when wanting to 
reopen the Squeak licence with Apple I'm surprised that no-one has 
mentioned that Apple (if thing are rational with this legal stuff) 
would just dump it under their current open source licence as most 
cost effective and 'er rational' solution.

http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/

Lots of discussion on that around.

Would that be better than today? Maybe the dog should continue to sleep...
-- 
--
===========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> 1-800-477-2659
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
===========================================================================