UI Models
Gary McGovern
gary.play at btopenworld.com
Fri Feb 15 20:10:43 UTC 2002
Thanks Leandro,
That's something I've seen often and wondered what it was. How do I learn that ?
Gary
15/02/02 06:07:36, Leandro Caniglia <caniglia at dm.uba.ar> wrote:
>Gary McGovern wrote:
>> Are there any other UI paradigums ?
>
>What about direct manipulation of objects with
>MorphicWrappers (aka MathMorphs)? In our experience MWs are
>the best way to get the taste of direct manipulation: no
>workspaces, no inspectors, no browsers, no applications.
>Objects exposed as they are, that's the feeling.
>
>/Leandro
>
>
>Gary McGovern wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm looking to categorise for myself the various UI paradigms available to Squeak. As far as I
know
>> there is:
>>
>> a)Domain model with orchestrating instance and application model with toolkit (morphic).
>>
>> b)As above without the toolkit.(mvc and morphic)
>>
>> c)Direct manipulation with scripting. No domain model.
>>
>> Does anyone anticipate that the direct manipulation with scripting will be used in business
computing
>> or is it expected to be in the personal computing realm only ?
>>
>> Pluggable UIs aren't so clear to me. Am I right in thinking that pluggable components fit directly
to
>> objects within the domain model without an orchestrating instance and application model ? I've
been
>> doing it that way but feel a little guilt as if I'm cheating :-)
>>
>> Are there any other UI paradigums ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Gary
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|