Gary,

It wasn't a dumb question at all. But from the replies, you can tell
that many people are very passionate about Smalltalk in general
and Squeak in particular! :-)

As one of the guys that made the original Java/Squeak decision,
I can say that there's one critical feature that Java didn't have
then and still doesn't have: the ability to modify classes
while the system is running, including modifying methods. Since
we wanted to create a dynamic programming environment, this
was essential. It's surprising that, after all this time, Java still
doesn't support on-the-fly programming.

We also preferred the Smalltalk "image model" to Java's
edit-compile-run model of program development. It seemed much
better for a kids programming environment.

So, faced with the same decision today, we'd almost certainly choose
to build Squeak all over again. For rapid prototyping, experimenting
with new forms of media, and creating programming environments
for kids, Squeak just can't be beat. Those are not Java's strengths.

If you are new to Smalltalk/Squeak, I hope you come to love it
the way many of us do.

	-- John


At 11:57 PM +0000 1/10/02, Gary McGovern wrote:
>Well, thanks for all the interesting replies :-)
>
>I didn't think it was such a dumb idea because according to 
>the docs, Java was considered as an initial language but 
>thought not mature enough and there seems to have been no 
>other reason.
>
>But I would be interested in more people making good things. 
>I've been waiting for better email,browser,irc and news.....
>
>I've made a start on a "browser" myself,(to download sites 
>into books) but that'll be a while yet.
>
>Thanks!
>Gary