Improving the aesthetics and usability of Squeak
Stephen Pair
spair at acm.org
Tue Jul 9 18:05:46 UTC 2002
No thanks...I don't want it that bad. ;)
- Stephen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On
> Behalf Of Andreas Raab
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:49 PM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: RE: Improving the aesthetics and usability of Squeak
>
>
> Stephen,
>
> Sure it would. Go ahead, write it! ;-)
>
> Cheers,
> - Andreas
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On
> > Behalf Of Stephen Pair
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:30 PM
> > To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > Subject: RE: Improving the aesthetics and usability of Squeak
> >
> >
> > Andreas,
> >
> > > I don't know how often I have said this but for the majority
> > > of stuff you may want to do you do *NOT* need callbacks.
> >
> > That may be true depending on the nature of the stuff you are
> > doin), but
> > the fact remains that if you need callbacks, you have to resort to a
> > plugin and C code to do it. It would be nice if FFI could handle
> > callbacks.
> >
> > - Stephen
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|