Improving the aesthetics and usability of Squeak

Stephen Pair spair at acm.org
Tue Jul 9 18:05:46 UTC 2002


No thanks...I don't want it that bad.  ;)

- Stephen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Andreas Raab
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:49 PM
> To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> Subject: RE: Improving the aesthetics and usability of Squeak
> 
> 
> Stephen,
> 
> Sure it would. Go ahead, write it! ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > [mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> > Behalf Of Stephen Pair
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:30 PM
> > To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > Subject: RE: Improving the aesthetics and usability of Squeak
> > 
> > 
> > Andreas,
> > 
> > > I don't know how often I have said this but for the majority
> > > of stuff you may want to do you do *NOT* need callbacks. 
> > 
> > That may be true depending on the nature of the stuff you are
> > doin), but
> > the fact remains that if you need callbacks, you have to resort to a
> > plugin and C code to do it.  It would be nice if FFI could handle
> > callbacks.
> > 
> > - Stephen
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list