On Monday 15 July 2002 05:12 pm, Aaron J Reichow wrote:
> If you wouldn't mind, trying out the Dynapad image, and running a
> '0 tinyBenchmarks' would be awesome.  The Dynapad image can be
> found on http://dynapad.swiki.net/8

0 tinyBenchmarks => 3389830 bytecodes/sec; 90541 sends/sec

Compared to my desktop machine:
	'78239608 bytecodes/sec; 2142034 sends/sec'

it's what, about 20+ times slower?

I did notice that Morphic -- at least bringing up menus, etc. -- is 
considerably faster in your image than the 3.2 image I last tried.

I wonder why.

Anyone know why bringing up menus in 3.2 would be slower than in 2.8?

I suspect you may need to tweak Dynapad a bit to work in a 640x240 
screen... 
-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE