Squeak on WinCE HPC MIPS?

Brian Zhou oofun at mac.com
Tue Jul 16 06:10:50 UTC 2002


A newbie question: I can get Squeak running on my iPaq fine, a MVC image,
but how do you guys "Do it", "Print it" in a workspace with just the pen
input? I could not find "Alt" key anywhere on the mini-keyboard.

Thanks in advance,

-Brian

----- Original Message -----
From: <reic0024 at d.umn.edu>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:45 AM
Subject: Re: Squeak on WinCE HPC MIPS?


> Ned Konz <ned at bike-nomad.com> wrote:
> > On Monday 15 July 2002 05:12 pm, Aaron J Reichow wrote:
> > > If you wouldn't mind, trying out the Dynapad image, and running a
> > > '0 tinyBenchmarks' would be awesome.  The Dynapad image can be
> > > found on http://dynapad.swiki.net/8
> >
> > 0 tinyBenchmarks => 3389830 bytecodes/sec; 90541 sends/sec
>
> On my 206 MHz iPAQ, I get 4739336 bytecodes/sec; 386492 sends/sec.
> Perhaps I should look into getting an optmized GNU VM- your 131 MHz
> machine gets twice the bytecodes/sec than my 206 MHz StrongARM. Is there
> any page up about the procedure behind that?
>
> > I did notice that Morphic -- at least bringing up menus, etc. -- is
> > considerably faster in your image than the 3.2 image I last tried.
> >
> > I wonder why.
> >
> > Anyone know why bringing up menus in 3.2 would be slower than in 2.8?
>
> There was a discussion about this a while back, with no conclusions
> other than that browsing is slower because the '-- all --' method
> category is selected right away.  However, myself and others have
> observed that there is a definate difference in how fast 2.8 and 3.2
> feel.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list