On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Ned Konz wrote:

> On Monday 15 July 2002 12:26 pm, reic0024 at d.umn.edu wrote:
> > I thought you had said that your un-optomized VM was going at about
> > 3.4 mil bytecodes/sec, and your optimized VM was going at about 10
> > mil bytecodes/sec.  Must've been the opposite way, with an order of
> > magnitude down (1 mil b/s unoptimized, 3.4 optimized). D'oh!
>
> Sorry to confuse matters. I gave the WinCE results and then threw in
> my desktop results as an aside.

Yes, but you also gave values of an upoptimized or optimized benchmarks in
a second email, right after the original one.

Aaron