Swiki locked
Jimmie Houchin
jhouchin at texoma.net
Wed Jul 17 15:51:46 UTC 2002
I think Scamper may be to restrictive on the audience thereby limiting
Swiki usage. Something that could be an interesting future option and
also usable for other web development purposes would be to develop an
authoring environment for the Squeak plugin. This will be an interesting
option (regardless of other security decisions) when the Squeak plugin
is mature enough and availability widespread enough to be inclusive of a
large audience. With the Squeak (web browser) plugin we would be able to
do some types of authentication that aren't available to simple web
programming. It could also help the spread of the Squeak plugin and
Squeak itself.
Just some thoughts.
Jimmie Houchin
Jason Rogers wrote:
> I vote no on that. Scamper isn't quite up to spec yet in my opinion,
> and thus I don't like using it. I think it would deter me from using
> the swiki altogether.
>
> =jason
>
> On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 21:17, Russell Allen wrote:
>
>>>Stephen Pair <spair at advantive.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I wonder if this problem could ultimately be solved using some sort of
>>>>web of trust relationships? Here's how it might work:
>>>
>>Something simpler - make it so you can only edit the swiki from
>>scamper... Should deter all but the most motivated hacker...
>>
>>:)
>>Russell
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|