danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:

> I've recently stopped using Squeak with 64M, and always allocate 128M.
> Obviously, this doesn't immediately translate into 128M of physical
> memory, so it's not as wasteful as it seems.
> 
> The RB does work alot harder than a usual browser, but it doesn't hold
> any huge data structures permanently, so I wouldn't worry about that too
> much unless you actually see a difference in behavior with or without
> it.


I've moved to 3.2gamma 4653 and it hasn't locked up in two days, so perhaps that and the extra memory has fixed it, although it only seems to be using around 25Mb, I'll take your advice and up it to 128Mb just to be sure.

Thanks

peter