As a self follow-up, I should mention that the entire Scribe 
documentation site is Scribe output, and that there is an Apache 
module for using Scribe dynamically. It also supports forms widgets, 
etc, which I think is an excellent starting point for allowing it to 
handle arbitrary morphs. Anyway, it reminded me of SqueakDot, so I 
suppose I'd also suggest that this be at least looked into for its 
design.

At 9:35 AM -0800 3/11/02, Brian Rice wrote:
>I'd think that Scribe (at http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Scribe/) 
>would be a much better fit with Squeak semantics, and at worst we 
>only really would need it ported to our new restricted Scheme 
>interpreter. ;)
>
>It's based on scheme, is object-oriented, uses lots of keyword 
>settings, and has support for Latex and HTML built in, as well as 
>Texinfo, man-pages, and straight ASCII. But this architecture is 
>extensible. It also allows for evaluating programs right in the 
>middle of your document.
>
>Seriously, it seems to have a fine model that translates the best 
>and is nicely abstract. I should mention however, that I don't have 
>the time to specifically work on this in the near future.
>Comments?
>
>~

~
--