"Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> Categories *are* annotations.  Does that clear up where I'm coming from?
>  A lot of the things you are saying we should extend Celeste for, are
> handled automatically by the categories mechanism.  It won't be exactly
> the same UI, but the functionality and the overall number of
> interactions will be about the same.


Oh!  Yes, this would work, wouldn't it?   In fact we could have the
categories #('.unread.' '.marked.' '.repliedto.') and certain actions in
the ui would stuff msgs in these categories.  Moving a msg from new to
squeak should not affect whether it is in one of these categories, while
selecting an .unread. msg for 5 seconds would remove it from the
.unread. category.  .repliedto. would gain an entry when we send a msg
generated as a reply.  Finally, .marked. can gain an entry when we
'flag' a msg through a menu option or something.

We still haven't heard anything about an address book.  I searched the
swiki with no hits.

I'm attaching a change to remove the scroll bars from the status panes.

Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Celeste class-buildMorphicViewsFor.st
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1042 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20020318/78e9dbc0/Celesteclass-buildMorphicViewsFor.obj