question about method dispatch

Ned Konz ned at bike-nomad.com
Fri May 10 19:03:25 UTC 2002


On Friday 10 May 2002 12:01 pm, Jessie Dedecker wrote:
> I already took the optional of the #doesNotUnderstand: method into
> account, however I would like to change the dispatch for <all>
> objects and <all> messages, also existing ones.But if I understood
> you correctly there is no way to change the dispatch using the
> reflective capabilities of Smalltalk?  So I should start looking at
> the C-code instead or did I understood it incorrectly?

Well, you don't have to look directly at C.

The interpreter is written in a Smalltalk subset that is compiled into 
C, so you can see and edit the sources (as well as simulate them) in 
the Smalltalk environment.

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list