Avi Bryant <avi at beta4.com> said:
>sqcvs may be useful, however.  What's the current status on that?  Your
>last post to the cvstproj list made it sound like it wasn't quite ready
>for prime time.
>
I don't want to spoil your fun, but since I've started working with StORE
(on VisualWorks), I find the other stuff unbearable and I rather just
shift changesets around when working with Squeak. Maybe we should beg
Cincom for the StORE sources ;-)

(as I've been suggesting too much and implementing myself too little lately, I
don't dare to suggest people interested in version management spend their time
on something that doesn't rely on legacy flat-file based tools. ahem...)


-- 
Cees de Groot               http://www.cdegroot.com     <cg at cdegroot.com>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD  1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B