danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
> 
> Now on SM.
> I'd appreciate it if someone ran the test suite, so I'm sure the new
> packaging is working. I've just found message complaining about these
> darn three files from almost a year ago, so I'm hoping this long
> standing problem is now fixed permanently.

Daniel,

Testing Report

- Fresh 3.2 image #4956 for Win32, on an NT 4.0 box.
- Installed SqueakMap using the simple script from the SqueakMap page at
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/2726
- Installed SARInstaller (since the RB did not appear as installable
until I did so, only appeared as downloadable)
- Installed the RB
- Installed Ned Konz's TestRunnerEnh ( can't stand running long tests
without it )
- "TestRunner open" in a workspace
- Refresh then Run All
- Take a walk

Results:
585 run, 583 passed, 2 failed, 0 errors
Failures:
	AllTestSelectorsFixTest>>testAllTestSelectors
	TestUUIDPrimitives>>testCreationNodeBased

Analysis:
	The AllTestSelectorsFixTest>>testAllTestSelectors is a failure due to
something I've seen and commented on privately before.  This is the
"infamous" Object>>testing  method that gets added to Object in the
Refactory-RBAddonsReasonable category.  With this selector included a
test looking for 2 method names beginning with "test*" becomes 3 and so
fails.

   My second failure is not regarding an RB test, so you may not be
interested.

   The TestUUIDPrimitives>>testCreationNodeBased failure is due to a
problem that I've seen before and commented on to John McIntosh since he
appears to have added it to the image.  I somehow get a different result
than John had expected for his test.  It looks valid but doesn't match
his expected pattern.

Overall, great work!  I'm going to try and be more helpful if I can find
the time.  I still believe that the RB work is extremely important to
the Squeak community.

Steve Gilbert