The change sets stuff is painful that way.
DVS makes it easy to fileout a system category + related methods. Check
it out...

Change sets are wonderful, but for different purposes ("What did I just
do in this image in the last three days?")

Daniel

Dustin Sallings <dustin+squeak at spy.net> wrote:
> Around 13:26 on Nov 12, 2002, Avi Bryant said:
> 
> # > 	When trying to file in a changeset I was working on last night, I
> # > get the following error:
> # >
> # > 	MessageNotUnderstood: commentStampt:prior:
> #
> # Dustin, that usually happens when the changeset adds methods (or in this
> # case comments) to a class that doesn't exist in the image you're filing
> # into.
> #
> # Did you have XML-RPC loaded when you created the changeset, but not now
> # that you're trying to file it in?
> 
> 	The changeset includes my XML-RPC implementation (at least, it's
> supposed to).  I've manually done it a couple of times trying to get that
> class definition into the cs.  I'm still pretty new to smalltalk in
> general, but as far as I can tell, I was getting everything I meant to get
> into the file.
> 
> 	Actually, I just opened the thing up in vi, and you're right, the
> comment stamp is there, but not the class itself...not even after.
> 
> 	OK, I deleted the next paragraph where I was asking more questions
> and figured it all out.  A couple of my classes ended up in the wrong
> changelist (well, *parts* of them did).  Got it all loading now, thanks!
> 
> --
> SPY                      My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
> pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin at spy.net>
> |    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
> L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________