about events
Chris Burkert
christian.burkert at s2000.tu-chemnitz.de
Fri Nov 15 15:40:39 UTC 2002
Hi all
Chris Burkert wrote:
> Should Morph>>on:send:to: be replaced with Object>>when:send:to: and
> the trigger message ? If yes I could take a look at this.
May I ask the upper Question again. Perhaps you missed it in the last
days full of giant steps. I hope it's not a stupid Question, but I'd
better ask instead of leaving it.
Do we need the Morphic EventHandler or could this be solved with events
in Objects trigger mechanism ?
I've took a look at both and I would say the trigger mechanism is more
elegant. Because of the changed interface in 3.4a we could design a new,
possibly faster Morph for 3.4. Of course that's much work. What do you
think ?
Regards
Chris Burkert
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student of applied Computer Science at Chemnitz University of Technology
http://www.chrisburkert.de/ chbu at hrz.tu-chemnitz.de
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have
C++ in mind." - Alan Kay --> http://www.squeak.org/
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|