Andreas.Raab at gmx.de wrote:
> Goran,
> 
> > That is of course the final goal. But that would be the harvest tool we
> > are planning.
> 
> Well, depending on how much work you want to put into it there's a lot of
> things you can already do. Consider that that a [FIX] [ENH] whatever is not
> owned by the registrant but  by the harvesters - then you could add extra tags
> for approving or rejecting things. That might be half of what's needed.
> 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas

Well, true - we will just have to sit down and see what we want/need.
It's on Doug's table! :-) But we will probably reuse the simple
architecture/code from SM and the SM UIs.

regards, Göran