Good...it sounds like the simplest thing that could possibly work.  It's
important I think to keep these things nicely separated from packages (as
they have the potential to grow permutationally with the number of
packages).

- Stephen

-----Original Message-----
From: squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-admin at lists.squeakfoundation.org]On Behalf Of Ned
Konz
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 10:03 PM
To: squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Subject: Re: DVS (thanks!) & SqueakMap thoughts


On Tuesday 19 November 2002 07:05 pm, Stephen Pair wrote:

> Sure, but what I would like is to be able to put the various
> packages on SqueakMap separately and then have "bundles" that are
> essentially just scripts that load a set of packages in a specific
> order.

That should be easy to do with plain ST fileins. The SqueakMap API
lets you download and install packages easily. We've discussed doing
this before to make 'image configurations' of various kinds that load
a number of different packages in order.

>  It would also be nice if SqueakMap would let me
> categorize these things separately from reqular packages.

It should be possible to add a "package format" category for these.

--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE