monticello

Avi Bryant avi at beta4.com
Thu Nov 21 08:46:28 UTC 2002


On 21 Nov 2002, Cees de Groot wrote:

> I'd rather have the option to choose on check-in. Even then, a
> commit-on-a-branch first with a subsequent merge would be fine. I do like the
> philosophy of StORE that 'the trunk' is whatever branch you care to designate
> as 'the trunk' and be liberal about branching. Branching in CVS is too hard.

Would it be too strange to allow both clientside and serverside merges?

> >As for lighterweight protocols than XML-RPC - well, XML-RPC is pretty darn
> >lightweight, but since you'll notice that there's only a small and well
> >separated bit of code that deals with the remote repository access, feel
> >free to send me an alternate implementation.  I'd be happy to lose some
> >dependencies.
> >
> SRP?

Hey, I'm just using ReferenceStream to send the actual data over the wire.
All XML-RPC is doing is marshalling and dispatching the method names, and
dealing with version numbers.  SRP doesn't do anything in that area,
right?




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list