Roel Wuyts <roel.wuyts at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> Done! StarBrowser can be installed from SqueakMap again.
> 
> While I admit it was pretty stupid from me to not go and actually look 
> at the file, I am wondering whether the process cannot be improved a 
> little:
> (1) it is strange that the error file has exactly the same name, 
> leading to this kind of problem. Maybe calling it starbrowser.sar-error 
> could give a better indication
> (2) maybe it is possible to just display the error, which is also done 
> when the network is unavailable.
> 
> (You that I should know by now to not do this kind of thing early in 
> the morning, but alas... )

Perhaps best would be if SM tried the url and checked for the 404. It
could then say, "Hey - that url seems incorrect!".

regards, Göran