[ANN] Actalk on SM

Cees de Groot cg at cdegroot.com
Mon Nov 25 17:14:44 UTC 2002


 <goran.hultgren at bluefish.se> said:
>So Andrew: Do we in general need to include the full license somehow in
>a downloadable package? Or does a note with a url suffice?
>
IANAL (but I always scored highest grades for law in business school, FWIW
;-)), but it's a sliding scale:
1. Signed licence agreement;
2. Obtain personal details, then click-through;
3. Click-through;
4. Include prominently in package;
5. Refer to in package with URL;
6. Refer to in package by name.
How much protection and against whom do you want? For inclusion in the base
image, 6 would be enough for most of us ('this is under the SqueakL' on a
fix/enh/goodie should be more than enough to express the author's intent). 

-- 
Cees de Groot               http://www.cdegroot.com     <cg at cdegroot.com>
GnuPG 1024D/E0989E8B 0016 F679 F38D 5946 4ECD  1986 F303 937F E098 9E8B
Cogito ergo evigilo



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list