Anthony,

> PhiHo, it sounds like you dont have the latest update to VI4 installed,
> entitled "VI4ObsoleteMap".  Get it from the VI4 website and make sure
> your mapObsoleteClassNamesToNewVI4Classes preference in the update
> category is on (this is the default).  Then update to 3.4.  It should

    My bad! Thanks for reminding me.
    My Squeak3.4alpha[VI4] is now at latest update: #5125

> From looking at the picture Jeff sent, it looks like Jeff's problem has
> to do with incompatibility between WindowsProcess and the new VI4
> Process2/SuspencedProcess.  If you can't figure it out, I will look into
it.

    David would be more helpful than I am ;-)

    Cheers,

    PhiHo.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Hannan" <ajh18 at cornell.edu>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Cc: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: RE: Halloween SqMOM doesn't like OSProcess on win32 - now have VI4
problem


> "PhiHo Hoang" <phiho.hoang at rogers.com> wrote:
> > I like to reproduce this. Please tell me how did you
> > get at the clean 3.4 image in VI4 format ?
> > I tried to update the stock 3.2 in VI4 format from VI4
> > home page.
> > At update 5005u16-Events, I got a walkback:
> > "Error: BlockContext no longer exists in VI4
> > See UndeclaredVariable #vi4Obsolete for alternatives"
>
> PhiHo, it sounds like you dont have the latest update to VI4 installed,
> entitled "VI4ObsoleteMap".  Get it from the VI4 website and make sure
> your mapObsoleteClassNamesToNewVI4Classes preference in the update
> category is on (this is the default).  Then update to 3.4.  It should
> work although you should double check that the methods being added to
> new classes like BlockClosure, still makes sense (see vi4Obsolete).  I
will
> release a 3.4 version of VI4 when 3.4 becomes stable.
>
> From looking at the picture Jeff sent, it looks like Jeff's problem has
> to do with incompatibility between WindowsProcess and the new VI4
> Process2/SuspencedProcess.  If you can't figure it out, I will look into
it.
>
> Cheers,
> Anthony
>