> > I'm attacking error reporting in the SMInstaller download/install 
> > process right now; perhaps I could do something about what 
> you found.
> 
> Ok, Ned - don't put too many hours into it though - I want to change
> that stuff into dynamically registered services instead. But for 3.4 I
> gladly take "fixes"!
> 
> And regarding the dependency stuff - we can add stuff like 
> you showed -
> and I did outline these things in a posting about "load scripts"
> earlier. But I don't want people hacking too much for dependencies
> because in 1.1 (or 2.0 or whatever) of SM (for Squeak 3.5 I guess) we
> will add package releases and the API will be reworked to take these
> things into account. I am working on this as we speak.

I'd like  to get some sort of dependency support into 3.4,
hopefully without making more work for you Goran.

Something low cost that will help late adopters of 3.4 to easily 
use SqueakMap with as few problems and questions as possible.