On Wednesday 23 October 2002 10:58 am, Avi Bryant wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002 goran.hultgren at bluefish.se wrote:
> > Personally I think this could be really useful and when/if we
> > decide to add support for individual package update streams in
> > SqueakMap (which I think we should ASAP)
>
> Well, I'm not so interested in package update streams, since
> they're pretty much unnecessary if you use DVS instead - I find it
> much more reliable to have DVS figure out the differences between
> the current version loaded into an image and whatever the newest
> version is, than to depend on the developer having produced that
> patch by hand.
>
> But that only works for code packaged with DVS, of course.

How would you use DVS for a package that included a removal of a 
method that's shipped with some other (non-DVS) package? I ran into 
this just now, as I'd needed to do a little re-factoring on some 
system classes to make something work.

Since DVS doesn't seem to be able to express method removals, it would 
seem to be unable to do this...

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com
GPG key ID: BEEA7EFE