Investigating fullBounds/layoutChanged

Eddie Cottongim squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Fri Oct 18 03:05:58 UTC 2002


41.2% spent in fullBounds on a slow (133mhz) system.
8.2% spent in fullBounds on a faster (600mhz) system.

Eddie

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Arning" <arning at charm.net>
To: <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: Investigating fullBounds/layoutChanged


> On Thu, 17 Oct 2002 22:26:23 -0400 "Eddie Cottongim"
<cottonsqueak at earthlink.net> wrote:
> >Maybe its worth overriding position: in HandMorph not to send owner
> >layoutChanged. Mouse
> >move events come in at a pretty high rate and chew up a considerable
amount
> >of time, especially on
> >a slow system, so optimizing this special case could help.
>
> I'm curious - if you start a MessageTally and twirl the mouse around for a
while and then stop the MessageTally, what percent of the cpu are you seeing
in #layoutChanged or #fullBounds?
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
>





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list