Odd 'dead' primitives
Ian Piumarta
squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
Fri Oct 18 05:13:03 UTC 2002
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Tim Rowledge wrote:
> "Andreas Raab" <Andreas.Raab at gmx.de> is claimed by the authorities to have written:
>
> > > (123 primitiveValueUninterruptably)"@@@: Remove this when all VMs have
> [snip]
> > otherwise fail and run all of the old stuff" primitive. I can't say if
> > that's still a problem these days but I wouldn't bet on it.
> Ah yes, of course; fortunately I'm aiming these changes at the VI4 so
> backwards compatability isn't much of a problem. Do you remember what
> needs doing in the image to remove it? I'm feeling far too lazy to work
> it out for myself if there is any chance of somebody already knowing the
> answer.
Replace: <primitive: 123> (valueUninterruptably [sic])
with: <primitive: 81> (value)
in the primitive method definition.
Ian
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|